SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : MINE vs IKAR
MINE 0.00Jul 19 5:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alan Markoff who wrote (19)4/10/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: CIMA  Read Replies (1) of 94
 
Wish you'd post this stuff on Golden Eagle's thread. MoneyMaker is new to the story and some of the longtimers would be able and hopefully willing to add some insight where he/she couldn't. There is a geological report due out by the end of the month, the first with proven reserves. And in all fairness, MINE is a reporting company, IKAR is not. You can look up all of MINE's SEC filings on Edgar. Management is legally liable for all claims made. IKAR can say whatever they want, but they aren't legally liable (yet, because I know they have plans to become a reporting company) within the guidelines estabished by a Securities Exchange Commission. In fact, a good test for IKAR management will occur once they do become a reporting company. As a shareholder I'd be watching to ensure everything filed matched with what they said when they weren't reporting.

If you want varied responses to your questions, which are valid and well-supported, please come over to the Golden Eagle thread.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News