<<Your use of the word "another" implies I have been wrong about at least one other thing. With the hundreds of posts I made here last year when I had more time, surely it should have been easy to find examples of errors...>
"wrong about at least one other thing"? Hey Sid, I'll show you two of your errors.
No... wait, this is deja-vu all over again. You posted this same challenge at the end of message #1662 on Jan 7. I pointed out your mistakes in my messages #1675, 1677, and 1678. And what was your response? Nothing. You disappeared from the thread for 2 months.
So at the risk of repeating myself, I'll try again.
Mistake #1: In message #1662, you quoted a "carpoint" article stating that carbon dioxide emissions from the Toyota Prius are reduced by 90%. You used this statement to claim that fuel cells are "no cleaner". As I pointed out in message #1675, the original Newswire article states that the reductions are only "50 percent for carbon dioxide". You didn't do your homework on this one.
Mistake #2: In message #1662, you concluded that a fuel cell car (running on gasoline) would get 50% better gas mileage and you state that "methanol may be somewhat more efficient, but not greatly so." As I pointed out in message #1678, according to the Wired article, "methanol... it's fuel economy, 2.5 times that of an ICE". Again, you didn't do your homework.
So Sid, feel free to ignore this response to your latest challenge too. See you again in a couple of months...
Bob |
