SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Western Digital (WDC)
WDC 220.43-0.7%1:37 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (9083)4/10/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Jacky AY  Read Replies (1) of 11057
 
Your scenario #1 maybe correct. However, WDC probably did it not because on their own wishes but rather "WD continues to struggle with its 2.1GB per disk program." (see my post #9044) For WDC who may have trouble in MR program, manufacturing cost is going to be significantly higher than that of their competitors, thereby limiting their ability to cut price in response to competition.

Your scenario #2 is totally impossible since everyone in the PC box-making except those BTO guys are having inventory problem. Compaq and IBM were quoted as the major OEM's for WDC drives. It's very likely that WDC are currently experiencing slow orders until supply/demand balance is reached some 2 quarters from now. There're rumors on the street that the high-end DD inventory has been relieved. But that won't help WDC much since SEG is still the market leader in the high-end afterall with their 10000-rpm speediest drive and 2.5-GB/p rolling out this quarter.

The only medicine for WDC is to put more $$$ in R&D to catch up with the market. They were once the time-to-market leader but now they may be the last one to roll out 2.5-2.8GB/p products. As far as I know, only QNTM, WDC and Fujitsu haven't announced products in that density range...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext