No my remarks are an exaggeration. I never back up my remarks about other peoples opinions because they are just opinions...they rarely have back-up for their positions in the first place.
So yes, my remark about 1929 is an exaggeration.
But I would think that's obvious. We're talking about a big kahuna here. I suppose 1929 was a Big Kahuna and we are speaking of a big kahuna.
I have no problem with any of this "kahuna-speak", my posture is to play for a change and win or lose I get out quickly. Anyone who holds out for a "Big Kahuna" will, more often than not, get fried. I have not gone back to re-check earlier posts on this....to be honest, the entire concept of following Dave's scenario has me leaning a bit to the bullish side, at least into expiry....but no. I don't wish to put forth the concept that kerPlunk is calling for 1929. Frankly, I don't know what the hell he's calling for. Has he said?
No, he has not. It's a Biblical kind of thing. Hey, for all we know, the guy's an atheist. |
