Tech Stock Options Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: donald sew who wrote (38981)	4/10/1998 7:05:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (2) of 58727

I scanned the other 4 (to date ) replies to your post and I have to say that I have been reluctantly saying the same thing. I say reluctantly because I do not wish to appear to slam kerPlunk. He has a nice technique but it does appear to be somewhat of a long shot. Further, what Dave does not yet realize is that everytime he sneezes someone will buy or sell, right or wrong. It's a heavy responsibility in a moral sense and he seems to be sort of young to accept that. Personally I agree 100%, in that I would be more concerned about someone who took a trade on an off hand remark by myself. I could lose a bunch and shake it off and someone else who took my advice might have a tough time making the rent payment. So, to refer to lisa's remarks about these people that don't post trades because they want to get their price before letting others in on the "move".....the hell with them. Like you, I'm more reluctant to say what I'm doing because of the off chance some person who cannot afford it takes a bath on a trade I was in and out of quicker than I could post on. So to sum up, Dave may be correct. But longshots are not the way intelligent gamblers stay in the game.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next