Alan, I posted to your response to GaBard's unusual findings from history instead of to GaBard.
But isn't this fun? Who would have guessed in August we would all be here? Go figure.
But this new concept of Jehovah goes off the Reichter scale. I am most curious to trace it.
TO GABARD IF YOU CARE TO RESPOND, AND IF YOU DON'T, DON'T. JUST CURIOUS.
What drugged out hippy did you get that pagan ancient history from?
It's as bad a made up thing as I've ever heard. But, please, please, please, source and bibliography that led you to such a
find.]
Now, honestly, I'm not trying to be cute here, but is that something that maybe aliens who abduct and do little brain transplants on people and then they go on "Sightings" show on Fox, is that perhaps the source. Cosmic? I've never wandered across such pagan horse dropping in mylife, and I've had to step through about all of it.
Any new source is always interesting. Anyway, source?
I have some state of the art sources--Hyslop, who held a chair at Cambridge and was rather beyond the PhD stage. His work the Two Babylons, involving all pagan caca, did not even entail that one. |
