Canadian Small Cap Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Small Cap Stocks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ally who wrote (49)	4/12/1998 3:49:00 PM
From: Jamie	Read Replies (1) of 512

Thankyou for taking a look at Envoy. Its always useful to have other opinions, especially from a proffesional. In fact, I much prefer to see opinions differing from my own on these boards as opposed to everyone just agreeing with how much money they're all going to make. I think the structure of Envoy's separate units is because they originally owned only a % of them, leaving the rest in the hands of the vendors - ensuring they would stick around for a while. 3 of the 6 units only became 100% owned in 97. The point of having the companies assets (staff) leave is agood one. The company has indicated a reason for the delay in completing it's acquisition was the need to negotiate lockups with key employees. YEar over year quarterly growth as exhibited some volatility as quarters are compared to quarters when big contracts kicked in. As the big A+W contract was won in q1, I would expect the year over year growth to exceed 14% going forward. The company definately needs to put its cash to work to avoid the dilutive effects of the financing. They say this will be accomplished soon. Again thanks for looking at it. I look forward to seeing what 11 you come up with. Maybe I'll have another suggestion in the future.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next