SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: paul e thomas who wrote (10999)4/15/1998 1:22:00 PM
From: Josef Svejk  Read Replies (1) of 13949
 
Humbly report, All, from the INTC 10-K re. y2k:


Like many other companies, the year 2000 computer issue creates risk for
Intel. If internal systems do not correctly recognize date information when
the year changes to 2000, there could be an adverse impact on the Company's
operations. The Company has initiated a comprehensive project to prepare its
computer systems for the year 2000 and plans to have changes to critical
systems completed by the first quarter of 1999 to allow time for testing. The
Company is also assessing the capability of its products sold to customers
over a period of years to handle the year 2000 and has a plan in place to
address product issues during 1998. Management believes that the likelihood
of a material adverse impact due to problems with internal systems or products
sold to customers is remote and expects that the cost of these projects over
the next two years will not have a material effect on the Company's financial
position or overall trends in results of operations. Intel is also contacting
critical suppliers of products and services to determine that the suppliers'
operations and the products and services they provide are year 2000 capable
or to monitor their progress toward year 2000 capability. There can be no
assurance that another company's failure to ensure year 2000 capability would
not have an adverse effect on the Company.

From: edgar-online.com


Is it reasonable to conclude this to be the standard y2k disclosure statement, a variation of which we're bound to see over and over again?

Svejk
(GL-15 applies: digiserve.com ;-)

P.S. #11000!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext