Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 34.50

+2.6%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maverick who wrote (53457)	4/15/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: Thomas G. Busillo	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Maverick, Kurlak's Kurlak. But what I would like to know, is when exactly did this "60" business actually happen. Specifically, when did Kurlak enunciate it? Was it in his morning conf. call? Or did he enunciate his downside price estimate later in the day? Did he, Thomas P. Kurlak, in fact enunciate it? His office said Kurlak saw "additional downside" for Intel shares but declined to give a specific target I'm sort of missing the point of Merrill Lynch keeping this thing in the realm of speculation. Either the guy mentioned an estimated downside figure or he didn't. Is Merrill afraid this call will do as well as his options Friday "MU to 20" call? Hey, how about that - CNBC runs a story about Tom Kurlak allegedly giving a downside price target on a heavily traded stock with a lot of options open interest right before an options expiration. Good trading, Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next