Ken, you need to read a few more posts before you lash out at people. There has been a lot of discussion on this thread of the good, bad, and the ugly, and Curly has been right in the middle of it with good information. We have discussed alternative technologies such as x-ray lithography and Scalpel ad nauseum. Guess what? Recent tests at the University of Texas and elsewhere proved that DUV is the way to go for .08 micron and beyond. The Coherent story has been played time and again, but thus far has failed to materialize, while CYMI lengthens its lead.
Hell yes, everyone here cares about competition. There will be competition for CYMI's business. However, we care more about about substantiated facts than self-serving press releases.
Speaking of facts, I noticed your post:
exchange2000.com
I can find free screening programs. I can find free buy-side advice. I cannot find
nay-sayers. I would pay for this. I've noticed that SI cautions and removes posters and
messages that offend company investors. At that point SI becomes gossip. Not a
serious discussion of investment principal.
My sense is that the information content of Yahoo has surpassed SI. The only problem
with Yahoo is the layout. It remains cumbersome to scan through the messages on that
board.
Can you show us single example of, as you claim, SI removing either "posters" or "messages" that offend company investors? |
