SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dave rose who wrote (450)4/17/1998 4:19:00 PM
From: Dragonfly  Read Replies (3) of 5853
 
If you read the statements you will agree that every statement made is true although it may be exaggeration. Unfortunately they become less and less of an exaggeration.

They may feel true to you, but that is not using reason, that is using emotion. To use reason, you must find the logic and the facts that back up the conclusion.

Ayn Rand does not, as far as I can tell, believe in reason. She believes in emotion, and convinces her followers that when they are following their feelings, they are using reason.

I read the statements and they are nonsense. Conclusions, with no facts to support them. Since she does not bother to provide evidence, how can one take these things seriously.

I'd be happy for someone to prove me wrong here, it should be quite easy, but nobody has (and I've raised the issue before in other venues). Simply provide an example of (or pointer to) an essay that uses logic and statements of fact to make a point in her philosophy. Every one I've analyzed using college level logic (and mine is not the strongest) fails.

Dragonfly
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext