<<Too much of a coward to make his point when the stock is strong.>>
With personal insults and comments like that when he has been vindicated, it is no wonder that he didn't post more while the price was rising on hype. I can only imagine the personal attacks he would have received (and did receive when he did) had he continued to post while it was going up?? Did you really want him here continuing to tell you that in his opinion this was a bad investment, a bad company, a bad stock? Did you really want him continually saying that he thought that the company did not have the sales they claimed to have? Did you really want to continue to hear his opinion of the CEO. I doubt it, which makes your "coward" flame a bit hypocritical, IMO.
Make up your mind. On the one hand you criticize him for not posting while the price was rising (implying, at least, that he should have been posting during that time so as to have avoided the "coward" label) and then you ask him not to post anymore when he does when he appears to have been proven right and their is VERY bad news. Sounds to me like you only want to hear contrary opinions when they are contrary so they can be flamed - and even then I doubt that you want to hear them either.
The stock price may have been up nicely from December, but now, it appears that there was little, if any, legitimate reason for it.
Don't bother telling me that you would prefer that he never post - in good times or bad. So long as you and he are both on SI, he has just as much right as you do. If you don't like the content, debate it, challenge it, and argue it. But, leave the personal attacks on your side of the modem or take it to a PM.
Troy |
