Crystallex (KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E. Charters who wrote (8303)	4/20/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: Ally	Read Replies (2) of 10836

I'm in at $6.05... >>Dome knows pertty well what the decision will be as the motions to have these motions of KRY's suppressed have been dealt with by the courts and some feedback would be inevitable. This does not mean that would tell the truth about the weakness in their case. The motions before the admittance court to have the 11 motions of KRY's suppressed ont he basis of the non-ownership of the claims due to the invalidity of the Lemon-Torres-Mael transfer was disallowed at that stage. It is a matter of contention whether it has already been dealt with. We shall see.<< I'm a bit unclear here... 1. Besides KRY's motions to overturn MEM's resolutions (which is the decision we're waiting for now), is there another decision on Dome's motions to suppress KRY's motions that we are also waiting for? That is, there are 2 decisions now pending? 2. Half the stories refer to "KRY appealing a decision the court had previously awarded the properties to Dome"... is this yet another decision now pending? tia d

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next