Crystallex (KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ally who wrote (8333)	4/20/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) of 10836

The court case is to turn back or nullify the Ministry of Mines' (MEM) resolutions concerning CVG/Minca, not a previous court. It is not an appeal. There are not two cases, only one. It is the final case. There can be no cases flowing from this one or appeals of this decision as it is the Supreme Court. Motions to suppress are the defendant's way of preventing consideration of certain motions based on legal contentions. It is all part of the case. Dome has presented 2000 pages of briefs in this battle. We have to await the outcome. Hoet Linares, Crystallex's lawyer has not lost a case before the Supreme court in 19 years. He says he will not lose this one. Perhaps he is right. EC<:-}

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next