Gary,
You're right about me stirring the pot, for which I apologize.
I do, however, think that Tom Childs is guilty of overstating the case in regards to Frank. I'd previously sent Frank a private message commending him for his posts and for standing up the inquisitorial raking he was, I thought unfairly, getting. Then it struck me I was being hypocritical doing it in private, ergo my last few posts.
I appreciate all help being lent IMES shareholders by you, Tom, Don, etc. I also, however, appreciate that Frank is the only insider who's cluing us into his estimation of value. For that to be poo-poohed as shilling is, I think, counterproductive--and in that regard I have a stake, as I'm waiting for my chance to try one last time with this creepy little company. There are very few on this thread who really understood the value of the intellectual property, and anyone who is willing to share that is, to me, invaluable.
Again, I apologize.
Ivan |
