Well I don't call Placer liars much more than I call the whole freakin world liars, which is loud and often. As far as 'listening to Charters' goes, I listen to all, and heed few. Charters is among those few, for good reason. My thoughts on Carson are well known - any man who has to rely on colours and bolding and italics has got a serious credibility problem. At the same time - and I too think this is extra¤o - the only factual statement of Carson's that has been successfully challenged to date is his claim that Rodr¡guez was going to be disciplined by the head of the comitee. It was said in anger, no doubt, or maybe he heard that from the outgoing guy, who knows.
Re CVG and cbi's deal with them - I don't think anybody doubts for a minute that the CVG are cochinos corruptos, mordideros - m s - no hay palabras - but cbi's deal with them is unchallenged after eight years, while Placer's was challenged less than four years after signing. CVG has many gazetted claims, not all of which are being contested. It seems reasonable to assume that at least some of them were acquired legitimately. Many were not - check out some of the history, and you find some ugly stories. But I have never heard of a conflicting claim on La Salle.
La Salle is gazetted, was gazetted to CVG in 1990, right?
Las Cristinas is gazetted too - to Inversora Mael.
I just bought more Chesbar, btw. I like it a lot, but I see no contradiction with being long kry .......... salud ...... marcos |
