Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Robert Floyd who wrote (19977)	4/22/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: waverider	Read Replies (2) of 95453

Without being redundant, you might want to go after the winners and not put more money into a laggard. ESV was lagging and is now catching up with the rest, so it was a good idea to put some money there. However, we had a better perspective on that company due to Baird's excellent analysis. GLM, on the other hand, has always been a laggard and does not appear to be changing its course. The growth prospects are much better for companies like NE, CDG, and FGII than GLM. Ask yourself, why would you invest in GLM if other companies show better potential? Rick Hydrocarbon

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next