Hi, Juanita.
Why are we keeping these 'normal' hours??? And why do I feel this has become a much more "issue oriented" thread? Is it because We were expecting Chris to respond to some of our posts--as he said he would? By now, I (along with everyone else, I'm sure) had expected a response stating something like, "This post was wrong, this post was partially right, etc.etc., explaining JAWZ in the process.
And, you're right: Chris DOES owe us, not because he's IR, but because he committed himself. If he had said to one of us on the phone,"Gee, I'd really like to post a response, but I'm just too busy", that would have been fine. But, instead, we go on throwing out outlandish premises with the hope that Chris will set us straight. I'm still hoping.
In the meantime, it looks as though we're left to our own devices to figure out JAWZ technology, market, direction, competition, legality, and overall chances for success.
Personally, I'm still at the 50-50 level, and I'll stay until I see those odds decrease.
But it sure would be nice to get some feedback. |
