AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only!

AMD 213.43

+6.2%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ali Chen who wrote (5692)	4/22/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) of 6843

<Incidently, I do not remember you criticizing my post about enormous specification (and therefore cost) for Intel's SEC-bricks: The die size is not the whole story.> You make a point and I should have considered these added costs. For one though I think Intel is now making their own SRAMs for quality and performance reasons. You alluded to this. Which means they will be getting them at cost, which is probably below NEC's price. Also you know that AMD needs SRAMS on the motherboard for their L2 cache, yes they're cheaper but add in the cost nonetheless. Bottom line is if AMD's costs are low how come they keep losing so much money? EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next