SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 233.23+1.8%12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom D who wrote (3286)4/22/1998 11:50:00 PM
From: Gary Korn  Read Replies (1) of 164684
 
Some guesstimates based on Mediamatrix figures.

Assumptions:

1. 4Q97 sales were $66M

2. No xmas season effect (a very faulty assumption, but I want to give this some upside) (but see Assumption #5 below).

3. 4Q97 had 6.3% household penetration. 1Q98 had average pentration of 7% ((6.8 + 7.0 + 7.3)/3).

4. Thus, 1Q98 experienced an 11.1% household penetration increase over 4Q97. Assuming all of the extra penetration went to sales, an extra 11.1% over $66M sales would be an extra $7.3M sales, for a total of $66M + $7.3M = $73.3M

5. Alternative assumption: 1Q store visits generate 33% fewer sales than 4Q store visits (since there is no xmas). A 33% percent cut from what would otherwise have been $73.3M would translate to 1Q98 sales of about $50M, a 25% DECREASE from 4Q98.

How would the Street react to 1Q98 sales of $73.3M, an 11% increase over 4Q? Remember, for the other booksellers, 1Q98 typically shows a 33% drop-off from 4Q (see below postscripts).

How would the Street react to 1Q98 sales of just $50M, a 25% decrease?

Gary Korn

P.S. BKS had a 1Q sales decrease (from 4Q) of 33% last time.
P.S. BGP had a 1Q sales decrease (from 4Q) of 36% last time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext