Jeff,
1000 that's good isn't it :-). I calculate .880 myself but that was against weak pitching.
I can't remember criticizing your opinions on Voisey. I have checked but I can't, maybe my "server" is down. I happen to agree totally, that the ore will not be coming out of the ground soon. If you check my posts I bet 2003. But really, to blame this on one man and not a number of factors like power and tax rate negotiations, land claim uncertainty, environmental hold-ups, world nickel economics, Russian nickel production, laterite technology and internal INCO re-structuring is so lame its embarrassing. Check one of the last posts on the VBN thread. Someone goes one step further and blames "those liberals". I understand your irrational sensitivity in as much several other INCO employees I have talked with also continue to vilify Tobin. Others still are more rational and consider the above factors as more important and see a solid future for INCO. I happen to agree with the latter, that is my opinion only.
Regardless, this will probably have minimal effect on SVB. As long as the SVB group can raise public money for exploration the ROI should be above average to us investors. Who knows, if SVB can return a substantial orebody, an agreement with INCO may help with the start-up production economics for everyone.
The beauty of SI is that everyone's opinion is welcome and seems to carry equal weight!
1King |
