SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 98.59-2.8%Nov 13 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (10490)4/23/1998 1:06:00 PM
From: Zardoz  Read Replies (1) of 116761
 
"Vronskys premise that the XAU didn't tank because the general market crashed in 1987 is totally false. He also doesn't think the XAU wouldn't tank if the general market tanks today. He's just blowing hot air, IMHO. A couple of rate hikes would do in both. Jim"

See this I can agree with. Gold is a currency, and as such is effected by cross rates. We all see it priced in US Dollars. If US was to raise interest rates, than the inflow into higher yielding safer instruments will cause the US dollar to rise. This will push the Gold price down, and than gold stocks, as well as the markets.

But I'm not a fan of Vronskys, and find him incorrect many times, including now. He needs to clarify the difference between a high inflation rate, high growth rate, against the now low inflation rate, and decreasing growth rates. Gold stocks prices have little to do with wether they are high or low. It's only the valuation relative to gold's price that is significant. Just because gold stocks are low, never means that they will have a bull run.

This is a case of: X effects Y, Y effect Z, but Z need not effect Y, and Y may not effect X

Gold next direction may very well be down, especially if the US few rates are raised.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext