Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: B. Thomson who wrote (1875)	4/23/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: CLK	Read Replies (1) of 3335

I think the bottom has been seen on SIR and ERB. .70 and 1.05 were the numbers I think were the low trades and I think that SIR at .70 to .80 were lucky buys for those who bought there. The fact that the volume dried up at these levels is a very significant technical sign inho. Hope some of those on this thread got some. In any case you just do not keep the interest of major oil companies unless you have something to interest them in. One can conclude they hit something based on such deductive reasoning. Coal bed methane projects are big projects, very very expensive. Companies the size of Epic/Safari have no chance to develop them alone. Buying low always seems difficult but that is exactly what one must do if one is to do well in thinly traded junior speculative issues. All fingers crossed now.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next