SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS)
COMS 0.00130-18.8%Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: joe who wrote (15278)4/24/1998 12:26:00 AM
From: Mang Cheng  Read Replies (1) of 45548
 
The following is from my ISP, most of their 56K RAS are those much cheaper Livingston's RAS (they cost 1/3 of the price of USR) with a small amount of USR RAS, they told me they couldn't afford USR stuff . But I doubt very much their suggestion of using un-upgraded 56KFlex to dial right into V.90 is a good idea. I'll have to give them some hell about this, my understanding is that Flex's V.90 is not backward compatible (only x2 is backward compatible, unless Lu has this problem solved) :

*****************************************************************
Hi all..

Just letting you know that all 506 of our digital modems have now been
upgraded to the new v.90 proposed 56K standard.

IF YOU HAVE A 56K modem, this may affect you.

if you have a 56 modem, and HAVE UPGRADED to v.90 OR its a K56 flex modem
you should be dialing 434-xxxx.

If you have a 56K X2 modem that HAS NOT BEEN upgraded to v.90 (ask your
modem manufacturer) then you should be dialing 436-yyyy

All other users 33.6K or below, should be dialing 437-bbbb

(Red Deer users keep dialing the number you are dialing :)
It has also been upgraded.

Thank you for your time.

Kelly Shubert
System Administrator
Inter--- Conn--- Inc.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext