John, your right, I checked you have been around for a while, but you have not always had such a positive tune. Look at some of the things you have said in the past.
To: +Winer (1448 )
From: +john mcknight
Thursday, May 15 1997 1:51PM ET
Reply # of 1979
Hi all ,
Makes you think how co-operative and helpful Diamond works
really
were to STS this whole thing stinks and I think requires alot of
explanation
from our Honest management ,Who by the way I had e-mailed three
times
over the past month and still await a reply and oh yes I was
assured by
them when the stock dropped 65 cents that they still had the
property
and would be around for a long while another vancouver rip off
but so well done that we still beleive this bunch of incompetants
Regards
John
In fact in the past you have even agreed with me.
To: +Qwerty (1451 )
From: +john mcknight
Thursday, May 15 1997 2:34PM ET
Reply # of 1979
Hi qwerty,
That's excactly what i was implying the plot now is unfolding
and let's be honest .regardless as to what they turn up in Angola or
Uganda there is no commercial credabillity left , it would be like
taking candy from kids if they come up with anything the big boys
will just take it away AGAIN or lose it like they lost everything
else
regards
john
But I think the next post is probably my favourite
To: +Mike Paulin (1472 )
From: +john mcknight
Thursday, May 22 1997 6:35PM ET
Reply # of 1979
Hi Mike,
What it means is that the management are getting ready to throw
another $400.000 down the drain .
Questios
1 Why could the company not raiase $600.000 against a property
that had proven reserves?
2 Is the company again going to do the spade work on this property
so that some one else can again pick it up cheaply when reserves
are proven?
This whole business stinks
Regards
John
John I could go on and pull out alot more posts but I think you get my drift. So John are you in the know all of a sudden.
John, you might find me negative, but at least I am consistent. Unless something has changed STS will lose this property as well. |
