SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 489.61+1.4%3:24 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Harry Sharp who wrote (6151)4/25/1998 3:31:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Harry, you sure are condescending. Further, you are not correct. Manufacturers certainly CAN and DO demand that their product be sold by resellers at a certain price, not a dollar more or a dollar less, on pain of having their reseller status yanked. In fact, software manufacturers MUCH MORE OFTEN than not do this. It's standard operating procedure in the software mfr/reseller relationship. Do you think it's a coincidence that ALL RETAILERS have sold Win95 for exactly $89, ever since that precise, preset day (set by MSFT) back in August of 1995? Hmmmmm? Why would you so ignorantly assume that MSFT can't dictate reseller prices? Hmmmmmmm?? Ever heard of TERMS OF CONTRACT? Do you think that Baan, Oracle, SAP, etc, all just tell their resellers, "just get whatever you can for the software, we don't care". No. They don't do this at all. The manufacturer sets the retail price, and the authorized reseller markets the product to prospective clients AT THAT PRICE, NO MORE, NO LESS.

Only in the last week actually, have I seen the Win95 upgrade RETAIL for less than $89, and that was for $88. I presume that MSFT gave that retailer permission.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext