International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Proton who wrote (31797)	4/25/1998 10:13:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) of 35569

Peter, I hope the Mr. H you are referring to is not I. What pains me, is that there are still zealots refusing to learn the language of the numbers. IPMCF has a burn rate, and at some point t (BRxt=cash on hand), the money spent will exceed their cash on hand. The recent delisting essentially closes the door to "traditional financing" and what is left is Reg S type financing, or floorless debentures, or another financial instrument devised to pull out money from the unsuspecting public into a black hole, followed by massive dilution an reverse splits in the near future (a year or so), or alternatively, CH 11. Zeev

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next