<What a surprise, you discount VectorVest's analysis because it punctures your optimistic view of WinStar's prospects>
What a surprise, you discount my analysis of VectorVest because it destroys the credibility of a supporting argument in your blind quest to discredit all who disagree with you.
No, I discount VectorVest's analysis because I've used it and have discovered it's limitations. I wouldn't trust VectorVest even if it rated Winstar a strong buy.
My investment in WCII is purely a business decision. I have no emotions regarding Winstar one way or the other. I would dump it in a heartbeat if I believed their prospects were less than optimistic. Your arguments have failed to sway me.
<VectorVest is unfailingly accurate in its predictions,>
Fink, aren't you exaggerating just a teensy, teensy bit?
<REGARDLESS of the industry sector analyzed. Value is value and WinStar has none>
"value is value" is a meaningless statement. Value is many things; technology, management, revenues, profits, customers, licenses etc.
Fink, it seems to me that every time someone disagrees with your arguments that you take it personal and have to get even through insults, exaggerations, half-truths and flimsy logic. Lighten up. |
