Jim? I take it you're saying Rebecca is CSHK's attorney? Funny. She says, according to you (my, my but you are a remarkable conduit of information--WHY, exactly, don't these people want to speak for themselves, asked yourself that?):
I believe that there are material omissions and misrepresentation in the information being provided to the Investors on this site, some of which border on libel and slander.
Dear me! Are we dealing with a lawyer who doesn't know the difference between libel and slander?
Really now. ANY lawyer knows that. Most laymen, do , too. Most lawyers are also aware that posting information available in the public domain is perfectly okay. Rebecca should also note that we've all prefaced our personal speculations with the phrase: "in my opinion"...
Other than that, well, Rebecca, we've offered "just the facts, ma'am".
One last point: why doesn't Rebecca offer the name of her law firm? It's normal to do so... Just curious, as always. |
