Rover, here you go pal. It's FTR (for the public record in case you need help). You can dessiminate this to the proper authorities:
I have no financial interest in seeing Cashco go up or down. I have no financial interest in any company that would benefit from Cashco going up or down.
In addition, my investments, stock or otherwise, are in completely unrelated sectors. I have no business dealings with any company who would benefit from seeing Cashco go up or down. I have no acquaintances, friends, associates, or relatives who would benefit from Cashco going up or down. To qualify that, I could not possibly know what is in all of their portfolios, but through various communications, I conclude with reasonable cause that they have no financial interests in the matter.
Strictly speaking, both sides weren't presented on the thread, in my opinion--the postive was overly enhanced, the negative was being unfairly suppressed. I felt morally obligated to give investors an opportunity to observe aspects of the company which--although they are public record in other areas of the internet--they were not being presented on the thread nor could they be easily found. I have a knowledge of the net that is a bit further ahead than many of the common public. I felt it proper to use this to look deeper and present the findings for the benefit of investors.
Additionally, although I do not hold any Y2K stocks at this writing, I have an interest in the industry because of its potential public impact. I feel that some companies have "cashed in" on this current popularity, yet are not really engaged in the industry to the best interests of investors. I feel that some newsletters actively "shill" this material. I feel that some of those shills post on SI. I feel it is potentially harmful to investors. I dislike seeing investors getting "taken in" by con artists.
The website, FBN Associates, is a parody which satirically demonstrates many aspects of these "scam" companys.
That's where it's "at" and it's verifiable.
Woof Woof, buddy. |
