SEXI: Mostly Fact, A Little Fiction, Not Vicious Attacks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : SEXI: Mostly Fact, A Little Fiction, Not Vicious Attacks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sedona Oracle who wrote (6286)	11/6/1996 7:29:00 PM
From: Mr. Aloha	of 13351

Technically, if Ms. Brooks sold ANY SHARES prior to December 1, 1996... she is in violation of the contract. I'm not familiar with the 'lockup' either and don't know the extent of inforcement. I think the option of paying $1,000,000 or 2,650,000 in shares is interesting. It appears that many of these large S-8's have a lockup restriction, that is good if it really means anything. On the other hand, if hardly any of the shares have been sold to market, does that mean that many of these are NOT OUTSTANDING YET? Have these 39+ million been included in the total 65.7 million shares? A current list of shareholders will be MOST VALUABLE! I wonder if Pat can deliver tommorrow and how current it is? What about the possibility that SEXI sold stock (some of the 65.7 million) to raise cash to pay off these individuals? Don't these ladies sound more like girlfriends than promoters? Huttoe would have been smart to sell stock at $3-4 to pay off these individuals. But why give someone $1,000,000 to close a buyout? Smells very fishy. Thanks for the info. Aloha

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next