Top Stories: Internet Telephony: Reality Will Have a Tough Time Living Up to the Dream [ASND reference]
By Kevin Petrie Staff Reporter 4/28/98 1:56 PM ET
thestreet.com Editor's note: This is the first in a four-part series outlining the brewing business of Internet telephony. Plenty of companies are making big bets on this much-hyped market as a path for future growth. Part two of the series, which will run Wednesday, examines the battle between giants Cisco and Lucent for dominance. In part three, on Thursday, we'll look at the companies that build the "gateways" to the Internet. And we'll wrap up Friday with part four, which examines prospects for the companies that make gateway components. If you have comments on this series, please send them to letters@thestreet.com.
It's an intoxicating vision.
People around the world will ring up colleagues and send faxes via boxes tied to the Internet, bypassing conventional phone service and saving big bucks using a technology called Internet telephony. Sure, the equipment market may be tiny now -- less than $250 million -- but the potential is huge.
Networker 3Com (COMS:Nasdaq) estimates that corporations will spend $8 billion to $15 billion annually on Internet Protocol telephony, called IP, likely the dominant flavor of Internet telephony. That figure equates to about one-third of the data networking market today. Even a more conservative estimate, this one from analyst Francois de Repentigny at research firm Frost & Sullivan, projects a $3.2 billion market in 2002.
Those who buy into the vision see Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq) keeping its blistering growth alive by branching from strict data systems into Internet telephony, or running traditional voice or fax services over data systems. The overall networking industry, after its core market has slowed slightly, will gain another engine for growth.
Led by giant Lucent (LU:NYSE), the slow-growth phone-gear market also will find another leg, the story goes. Meanwhile, a host of innovative companies such as VocalTec (VOCLF:Nasdaq) and NetSpeak (NSPK:Nasdaq) will thrive building telephone gateways to the Internet along with related products. Dialogic (DLGC:Nasdaq) and Natural Microsystems (NMSS:Nasdaq) will make loads of money supplying gateway components.
Wall Street, awash in cash, is drinking in this vision, figuring somewhere in this new world called Internet telephony waits the next Intel (INTC:Nasdaq).
But evidence is mounting that this dream will crystallize at a slower rate than investors first thought when it emerged in the last year or so. A few early birds are testing the technology, but it's awfully tough to find corporate customers -- likely the bulk of the market -- committing to Internet telephony. Quality remains spotty, which means the early draws will be cost savings and faxing, which is more tolerant of delays. Phone carriers are considering with characteristic caution the enormous task of upgrading to a new, reliable infrastructure. And don't forget, the Federal Communications Commission might levy a "universal service" charge on Internet calls and diminish the cost advantage for U.S. customers. Longer-term the marketing pitch must center on the advantage of customer call centers and broad network integration, a tougher sale than simple cost savings per minute.
Cisco and Lucent, each a titan in its field, are leading their peers into a bruising battle for the networks of the 21st century. Only one leader is likely to emerge. Gateway companies, including NetSpeak and VocalTec, have created a commodity business that the large players intend to steal.
There is one group of startups in the market that looks better positioned to thrive solo -- the gateway-component vendors, Dialogic and Natural Microsystems in particular. Their expertise and "arms dealer" status might just shield them from the big guys.
How Internet Telephony Works
Most major networkers -- Cisco, Ascend, 3Com, Bay Networks and others -- are revamping their routers and other data products to handle digitized packets of voice and fax traffic.
Inter-Tel, VocalTec, Lucent, NetSpeak and Northern Telecom are major suppliers of gateways. Cisco and Ascend have products that act as gateways.
Sources: NationsBanc Montgomery Securities, PITA Group
What compounds the risk for some of these companies is that most of their stocks already are richly valued. Cisco and Lucent are brushing record highs -- not because of Internet telephony, but if they stumble in this market it still could dent their market values. Asia's recent slide is instructive: In real terms the region represented a small part of U.S. sales but was huge in terms of potential growth. So when economies there wallowed, investors sold the stocks of U.S. exporters to the region. Many gateway and other small players have soared on the promise of Internet telephony.
"I think that hype might be ahead of reality" because deployment will proceed slowly, says analyst Bill Rabin at J.P. Morgan. "The truth is that nobody has a clue how this market is going to develop." The potential, however, is just so huge that no one can afford to let the train pass them by.
The new carrier Qwest (QWST:Nasdaq) is an example of a company that is preceded by its reputation. Shares of Qwest have soared on Wall Street enthusiasm about its plan to run voice and data across a network based entirely on Internet Protocol. But so far the company has made most of its money renting network space to carriers like Frontier (FRNT:Nasdaq) and GTE (GTE:NYSE) for conventional services.
"This revolution, like most that are inspired by technology, will take time," says an article published in January in Business Communications Review. In it, a BCR survey showed 59% of corporate customers expect to run only 5% or less of their internal phone calls on IP. Another 28% expect to make no calls using IP in the next three years. The key for vendors will be to find early adopters -- fully 30% of respondents think 10% or more of their internal voice calls might run through IP.
Analyst Sam Kim at Amerindo Advisers says that IP telephony will develop slowly because it still cannot guarantee the service reliability that carriers need. His fund once owned shares of Cisco and Ascend (ASND:Nasdaq), but currently it owns no stock with a stake in Internet telephony.
"If somebody can solve that quality of service problem with IP, we'll look at it very carefully," Kim says. Do any candidates come to mind? "No, sadly."
So what will drive the growth? Proponents have long argued that the Internet phone business is a play for the next century -- not immediate explosive returns. Rather, fax service, e-commerce (for example, connecting Web surfers to customer call centers), call-filtering features and the broader advantages of network integration will gradually lure the masses.
But de Repentigny at Frost & Sullivan sees little support among customers, at least for now. "Corporations are not demanding it at all, in Cisco's case particularly," he says. He does find it a natural evolution for Cisco to make, and a somewhat halting one for Lucent and Northern Telecom (NT:NYSE), an Ontario-based supplier of phone gear and rival of Lucent.
Phone carriers will purchase this gear cautiously, and use the trillion-dollar infrastructure that's already in the ground. "They're all trying to leverage what they currently have," says Craig Johnson, principal of the PITA Group, a consulting firm for purchasers of technology. "You do not throw things away."
All of which in the end may sober up the true believers.
See Also
TOP STORIES ARCHIVE |