SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tonto who wrote (46376)4/29/1998 6:11:00 PM
From: bmart  Read Replies (3) of 55532
 
Mr. Tonto,
I would like to apologize to this thread about my Good Friday congratulations. I was not going to post on this board until I was able to share good news, but I felt I could add in content and in flavor.
The meeting Mr. Tonto speaks of is very dated, 1996 I believe. It was a conversation in which Mr. Mork presented a 'scenario' to Mr. Morgan. Mr. Morgan declined the offer for ethical reasons.
A more important and relevant 'meeting', would be one much more recent where Mr. Mork attempted to obtain 200,000 shares of RMIL in return for dropping his civil suit against RMIL. Mr. Morgan , again, refused the offer on ethical grounds. It is Mr. Mork holding the illegal short position, isn't it?
Mr. Tonto, can you inform me and the patrons of this board if Mr. Morgan was charged with any crimes as your posts may suggests, I mean, has he been indited for any crimes in relation to RMIL? Has he been arrested for any crimes relating to RMIL? Is he prevented , in any way, from functioning as the CEO of RMIL because of any problems with the SEC? Did not the 8K satisfy the SEC? Can you tell this board any crimes or mis-doings that Gary Morgan and Roland Breton are currently being arrested or indited for? And, besides any cases relating to Mork, can you share with us ANY arrests, inditements, or legal proceedings against Morgan, Breton in relation to RMIL?
I suggest this. An individual in RMCW management spoke with the investor for over 1 1/2 hours last week. The distribution line is ready to go. The investor is as frustrated as anyone not being able to obtain the funds from his funds at the moment. This will hopefully be resolved very shortly. The investor is in contact with RMCW on a daily basis.
The merger is dependent upon the investor living up to his contractual obligation. To expect RMCW or RMIL to pull rabbits out of their respective hats, forego the merger and move on when they are confident the investor will live up to his contractual obligation. Shareholders show much resolve and patience supporting RMIL during this difficult time. It is not criminal to be in a period of transition as much of the nay posts suggests, it is difficult for RMCW which very much needs this merger for its own survival and to become a publically traded entity. It is difficult indeed for RMIL, which cannot just close the door on the merger and the $10MM cash infusion if they, in their diligence, believe the merger will eventually be realized. It is difficult on shareholders for they have money frozen in a very bullish market.
But it appears quite evident that it is most difficult for the illegal shortsellers of RMIL. Not much was mentioned on this board about the $.10 trade of 300 shares. Mr. Tonto is very persistent in painting RMIL as criminal, yet that act of the $.10 trade was criminal! It demonstrates very clearly for all to see who can be described as the criminals here. The act speaks loudly. Mr. Tonto failed to mention this act.
RMIL shareholders I applaud you, and I hope this resolves soon enough to reap your spoils in good spirits, do not allow the few to disrupt your focus!
Peace be with you!

RB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext