i was following them each for a couple weeks after signal days, and posting some that would return for bo's in the shortstuff,there was mention that they were dirty by that time but i figured a new bo is still a bo, between the shortstuff ($2-20)and a scan i run for stocks between 2 and 9.01,i probably peruse 150-200 a night, if my data is late all i get to is the one setting, and i don't make it to the 2.1.2 4.3.2 7.3.10etc
i'm doing this the hard way with qp,the result is 200*4, as many as 800 a nite, i need to do some fixing in parity to make this easier...only took me two months to realize all the additional crap i was doing by not fully optimizing parity,duh,i wanna go back and check everything for that mamlr you mentioned and see what i see before i ask...or wait for artt analysis you mentioned...if i can get them all on one setting...all the better. but i keep a book of all the stocks that i post with dates so i have shitloads for reference if there is something you want me to look into. these do seem to be news magnets, either the prior day or the day of, i don't know how i respond to this, i think sometimes i would rather see them without news as they sometimes seem more predictable without it. but the news also helps them with the move, just have to be a little quicker with those. so its double edged. as i said, i see one pop almost every day, another thing i have been wanting to review is the just buy it to the regulars, and their later reactions as well.if you got something you want me to look into let me know. i haven't started any of this and don't know when i'll get to it. but i do intend soon to be studying them further for additional confirmations, relations to the other sto's , the macd's i like,what makes a 2 become a 3, 3s and 5s, there is a lot more that can be done to determine an added factor. probably nothing ... but it will be a good study nontheless.have you done similar?
the whole daily routine is a lot of work to the point that i hardly get the additional data that is required for long term goodies, i have posted i don't look at the long stuff in the past because of time,2 years is what i have been working with and i'm sure this would narrow the list even more,and probably eliminate alot of the failure, maybe with the fixes to parity it won't take so long,qp just isn't cutting it, so i'm hoping to improve on the process to get the best results, for only doing this for a couple months, it is still in the learning curve stages as to how to best optimize my routine,but i can say if i'm watching a list of 10-20 i usually know where i want to be by 10 or 10:30. i have given away percentages by doing this and missed others completely, maybe if i can accomplish the additional longterm data perusal i would be more comfortable with a buy at the open approach, but without that being done i have hesitated.any input you have...
ramblinov |
