Clear Creek Resources - CK/VSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Clear Creek Resources - CK/VSE

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gary S who wrote (118)	5/1/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Francis Scavo	Read Replies (1) of 150

Gary <Sure, it would have been great if they had come up with 50 cpt with 95% gem quality stones > I would settle for 50 cpt. After rereading the NR a couple of things made the cpt count low. 1. <near surface kimberlite was considerably diluted by "country Rock" within the kimberlite complex.> Drilling should take care of that. 2.< significant portion of the diamonds was not recovered by the plant.> Drilling and core recoverly should take care of that. I would rather see $1500 carats than $100 or $200 ones. Also if the plant was not picking out the diamonds, we should be able to pick them out of the tailings with better equipt. Just a few ramblelings. Francis

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next