Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 76.04

-0.3%

Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill who wrote (13772)	5/1/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: Christopher Reed	Read Replies (1) of 77400

Bill Vaughn wrote: >Many properly blame AT&T procedures, but the fact is that CSCO put out faulty, untested, code. Where did you get the idea that the code was untested. I can't believe that the Cisco folks would ship code that was not tested. Cisco (nor a Lab) can not test all the cases that a switch will encounter in a live network. If there is any fault, It is that ATT did not internally communicate that there network failed. If a tech upgrades a switch and the network goes belly-up soon after, (s)he should realize that there is a good chance that the upgrade caused the problem. You owe me 2 cents. Cheers.. Chris.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next