Whoever has been hurt by investing in this stock, blame for that cannot be laid at the foot of the nays. The nays didn't cause the halt, RMIL's apparent misrepresentations did. The nays aren't the reason RMIL has not resumed trading, again, only RMIL is to blame for letting its financials slip for so long. The nays aren't the reason the investor hasn't come through. All the nays have done is question the viability of RMIL, both on the basis of fundamentals and as a short squeeze. Such attacks happen with almost every OTC stock discussed on SI, usually by non-investors. Why? Because they are not emotionally involved with the company, and can take a more objective view. For that reason, I usually welcome negative postings.
That said, I do agree that sometimes the delivery of the messages here are too acerbic for my taste, and personal attacks (by both sides) should be avoided. In the past, I have engaged in some of that myself, and I am making an effort to avoid such in the future.
Good luck to all shareholders, and may this all work out for our benefit.
Whatever reason that certain individuals chose to attack OVIS/RMIL,
whether for greed, personal gain, ego problems, revenge or the like, I still believe it is well worth fighting for the individuals they hurt in their path. |
