SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Oil & Gas Companies

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (853)11/8/1996 6:19:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman   of 24925
 
CANADIAN OILPATCH / PIPELINE NEWS

November 8, 1996
PIPELINE BONANZA

ÿ Billions of dollars are being tossed on the table as a clutch of natural gas pipeline companies race to pump Western Canada's abundant natural gas to thirsty markets in the U.S. Midwest.
ÿ At the top of the list is the new Alliance Pipeline Ltd. partnership, whose open season to attract firm shipping commitments from gas producers ends at midnight tonight.
ÿ "We're working hard and we're very optimistic," says Alliance vice-president Jack Crawford, echoing industry opinion that the proposal will go ahead.
ÿ Alliance is one of six major pipelines being proposed or expanded, a flurry of investment that hasn't been seen in 20 years.
ÿ And Canada's $7-billion natural gas industry needs it.
ÿ The sector is losing at least $2 billion annually because of the $1 US per thousand cu. ft. price difference between Canadian and U.S. prices.
ÿ That differential is expected to decline to less than 50 cents US with the proposed pipeline expansions.
ÿ Although prices have rallied over the last two weeks, sustained equitable prices aren't expected until the first of the new pipeline projects start transporting gas in November 1998.
ÿ Alliance, a consortium of 18 mainly Calgary-based companies, plans to spend $3.6 billion laying pipe.
ÿ The 3,000-km pipeline would carry gas and natural gas liquids from Fort St. John in northeast B.C. to Chicago and would compete with TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. and Nova Corp.'s lines in Alberta.
ÿ Over the next few years, TCPL plans to spend between $4 billion and $6 billion to expand capacity on its mainline.
ÿ The company had its own recent "open season" to attract shippers, which spokesman David Annesley says received "terrific" response.
ÿ The company plans to spend $900 million expanding its line to ship 287 million cu. ft. daily by November 1997.
ÿ Another hot proposal is the contentious Palliser Pipeline project. Jointly owned by PanCanadian Petroleum and Westcoast Energy Inc., the 240-km line would carry up to one billion cu. ft. daily from an area northeast of Calgary to the Saskatchewan border by November 1998.
ÿ Northern Border Pipeline Co.'s long-awaited $793-million US expansion project is expected to be completed by November 1998.
ÿ Owned by Enron Corp. (70%) and TCPL (30%) Northern Border -- which runs a line from Monchy, Sask., to Harper, Iowa -- proposes to build new line to Chicago, and carry 2.4 billion cu. ft. a day, an increase of 700 million cu. ft. a day.
ÿ Two controversial gas pipeline projects are also proposed for the East Coast Sable Island field.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext