Linda - at least your first sentence was honest
That was:
<<<I quoted you yesterday exactly, italicized. What you said was 100% false, and you haven't had the grace to admit you were wrong.>>>
Now, here's the italicized quote - taken from your post
I wrote that I had reduced my position because I was uncertain as to the effects of Asensio, Wexler and you could possibly have on the stock - it just was not worth the risk. None of the recent movements of this stock, up or down, can be justified in any fundamental manner - they're emotional. The liars had driven it too low, it recovered to 20 on its own, and has risen above wht I think is justified by the patent announcement.
Now, I posted THAT in response to your claim that...
<<<The people who had lots, sold a lot as it rose, glad to take their profits on a company that has questionable earning potential. Dauntless, for example, said he'd lightened his position considerably.>>>
I don't know for sure, but it sure seems like you're stating that I had lost faith in Zonagen's "earning potential" and, therefore, implying that there's something wrong with the Company and/or it's products. I didn't want that opinion assigned to me, by you, so I contested it.
That's all there is. |
