International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: go4it who wrote (31960)	5/2/1998 4:27:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Charles, wouldn't it be interesting if AZ ends up JVing with IPM to develop the property? <VBG> Under the circumstances, I think that IPM should go for damages, it could pay for property development. Interesting that Taylor is reevaluating based on lower OPTs, but still finds it a world class deposit. Seems everyone's becoming more realistic. I think that the issue with IPM has always been the ability to extract for a profit. While I initially argued with Robert that these companies weren't technology plays, he was right insisting they are. Maxam should soon let us know if that nut can be cracked.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next