SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slotman who wrote (1881)5/3/1998 9:25:00 AM
From: Dixie7777  Read Replies (1) of 8242
 
Slotman,

Great observation. Is there any way you could post the screen you were reading for the rest of the board. Someone over at the DGIV thread has done that and I believe it has helped their board gain a definite insight as to some of the MM machinations.

Additionally, please don't forget that these MM "games" are usually abetted by simultaneously having their partners, "intruders" or even so-called "established" posters on the attendant board, begin the process of provoking panic or otherwise causing people who had done their own DD, to now doubt the reasons as to why they originally invested in the 1st place. This helps creates the "snowball" atmosphere that allows the MM's to pick up as many cheap shares as possible. This is the artificial aspect of price manipulation that WE can control here on the board by understanding what's taking place.

As to this current ride down, I sincerely believe it has been shortened by an awareness here on the board. I also believe that the MM's wanted to be back in $1 range by Friday. They know what this stock is going to do in the next 2 weeks and beyond and the leverage they can apply will make them millions of dollars in the short, did I say short, run.

If we all remember why we bought PNLK in the 1st place, which since the appearance of Glen Z, has reinforced my original reasons, we will be less likely to sell on these "artificially" created dips.

Now, I too am interested in some of the questions that IC has asked, however, with the amount of technical expertise evident in his post, I must still ask why he has not done his DD and then posted the results here. He has access to the same info. And further, the biggest giveaway to me as to his motives, was the tenor of his post which was, IMNSHO, very negative and essentially chided all of us for being PNLK shareholders.

Next was the very curious and "simultaneous" appearance of Rudy. He and his "stincky stock" statement were meant to do only one thing, again IMNSHO, create a rush for the exits and get shares, cheap shares for the MM's.

If you will remember, I do because I closely monitor the bid/ask prices, the price had just started down and these two people appeared out of nowhere. NO COINCIDENCE, nice and civil people also reading this.

Rich

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext