Sergio: I beleave, but not 100% sure, that was an indepth Technical analysis of the, ultimate, fundamental reasoning behind the realization that most everyone needs a spell checker. Because of the reasoning set forth, it is assumed that content is NOT allways more important then using proper English. Kings English being the standard by with all others are " hierarchically entrenched".
"One can only guess at the far reaching effects this paradigm shift"
Looks as if volume should hit the stock, in a paradigm shift, a breakout to the vertically crossover point will cause a hierarchically entrenched condition.
I think this is a good case for TA disfunctionality, but I will check the edgar fillings to make sure that insider shorting selling has not caused disfunction of the on going, forward looking, earnings based on the Reg S statments made in the last Def 14 filings. If the Reg S statement becomes fully deluted, prior to the effective date of closer, I would expect that you will see a negitive effect on the bottom line of their 10-K, BUT, only if they should file the proper SC 13-D forms.
I would need to check into it much closer, but I think we have a condition of negitive forward movements of the top line based on the upward downdraft seen in both the TA and FA.
If we should see the 50 DMA cross over the 150 DMA, then the warrents should be recalled to allow the further declines in the Reg S delution.
Just my quick thoughts on the matter. I would stay clear of it. IMO
What was your take?
Scott
LOL |
