Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 76.07

-1.1%

Dec 1 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Thomas M. who wrote (13828)	5/3/1998 9:41:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (1) of 77400

Thomas, Well perhaps you didn't say it specifically, but you certainly eluded to it....and even went one step further by spreading untruths.... AT&T said nothing of the sort as you posted... Message 4287689 and you called Cisco customers "idiots". Message 4284032 So, Thomas, once again I appreciate your ability to generate some discussion on this thread but this is getting tiring. You walk in here and start chatting about the AT&T issue which was discussed to death 2 weeks ago (you're late)...then post information about deals lost last year...and point to the equipment as weak. Find me a switch that's older than 3 years old that hasn't failed in a large network. Question is; how does the offending company react...none has done this better than Cisco and Cisco will win many many more SP accounts because of this... With new products and a new effort to make ASND's life difficult I think Cisco is 90 by July/August.. 100+ by end of the year. You appear to be claiming that Cisco is in trouble because of the AT&T issue. So, Thomas...let's hear your projections. Quit the whining and tell us what you see in the future... Back it up with fundamentals..then lets' talk. You're not willing to put your money where your mouth is, but why don't you at least make a projection...go on record as it were. Up to know however you're "discussion points" have been weak and appear intended to simply create a confrontational atmosphere. I'm not sure what you're game is, you're not short...so you must simply like to argue... So, I'll bow out at this point and let you rant. If you wish to post something worth discussing then I'm open for it, but we're beating a dead horse here. Gary

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next