SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tiley who wrote (32385)5/4/1998 9:56:00 AM
From: Time Traveler  Read Replies (1) of 1571789
 
Since 0.25um is very new, yield problem actually does not apply to describe the production of 0.25um.

However, whatever was plaguing the 0.35um would very likely affect the new process as well. If it doesn't, Jerry would not make an emphasis bragging about the solved yield problem for that obsolete 0.35um stuff. Since he did, he knew 0.25um and 0.35um share the same root problems. It was his conscience speaking out.

Since Time Traveler does not currently resides in Silicon Valley, please show Time Traveler where the circumstantial evidence is to suggest that AMD has resolved the yield problems. From 2M K6 projected (1.55M this past quarter), with most of them 0.25um, it does not suggest a solved yield problem to Time Traveler, and Yousef. Where is that exponential increase if indeed the yield problems are behind AMD?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News