Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jon Tara who wrote (6424)	5/4/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) of 18444

Both Matty and David Sirk claim "secret" information. And as Terry T alluded earlier, each of them have been all over the board, relative to being pro- or anti-NETZ. So we all take their comments with a grain of salt. It's still my contention, however, that it is unfair to plant the term "investigation" into investor thinking. Whether you realize it or not, you create a fear element by hinting at such. You can't get off the hook by claiming their might be one. I'm mean where's the prudency in that kind of comment? Had you been fully objective with respect to all of your previous remarks, you might have some standing to suggest there "might" be an investigation. But all of your remarks in the past have been anti-NETZ. You're also on record as considering shorting business activities that involve NETZ--and ESVS involves NETZ. So what are we to think? That you are some kind of prudent messenger, as you would like us to believe? I don't think so. Were you prudent, you wouldn't use the term investigation because it is an insult to the hard-working people who comprise the many ESVS/Zulu components.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next