To Efrain and All,
This "Start" has been of late always been far from being
very clear to me.
Back in either late 95 or 96,in a article that I remember that
had no mention of EPEA, but pertained to the resolving of the
treaty agreement between former Russia and the US,the main part
of the no launch of ICBM,s was to be changed to where if either
country wanted to launch a ICBM,that inspectors from the other
country would have to inspect to make sure the payload [nose cone]
was a none weapon payload.Now like reading the "Start" part in where
they are talking mainly about not weapons,but weapons of nuclear
nature,does not seem to fit the EPEA matter correctly.
Next,Peacekeeper is a ICBM, but just as much so is the Delta
Rocket,with being a more powerful ICBM,and it could carry a nuclear
with no problem,but it is able to launch with different rules?
I cannot see the original treaty not covering any new ICBM's
developed after the treaty became effective.
I feel there is something missing that we do not know about that
is playing a major part for why EPEA is not launching right now,
and at the same time in last years press release with Spaceport,
launches were to start in 1999. As I said I do not have the
answer, but question it as being "Start". I will see if I can find
even some kind of clue to what is the missing part to this puzzle
later this week.
EPEA Believer * Richard
|
