I don't know about the kneecaps and all--heck I'd like for your walk in the park to be just as delightful as my own.
But I do know this, Jon. You have not been able to tell us one part of Hayton's version of what's happened in the past. You're a software architect (if I remember correctly). You can get access to the Lexus software. Why not look into it and find out what Hayton's defense was regarding those prior incidents. How many times do I have to put this challenge out there only to have it go unanswered?
You can do better than a Pete and Repeat of old Wired hash. Can't you?
Also, how do you reconcile the contradiction that Wired favored NETZ, until after the SIM executive leadership was removed? Once this happened, everything Wired reported thereafter became negative. This cost a lot of innocent people a lot of money, as they got scared into selling. Also, how do you reconcile that this vicious negative Wired bashing was timed with its hiring a former SIM employee?
Heck, if you're going to provide a news service, at least make it an up-to-date one.
You speak of objectivity. Then us something, even just a little, tiny bit, about Hayton's version of events. Don't skip over this and go onto something else. Tell us now.
Answer, as well: Aren't most brokerage houses that have been previously sanctioned by the SEC still functioning entities? What's the difference?
And one other thing. Your motives here still are unclear, at best. Not that we don't mind having you around. After all, even in your negative onslaughts, you still seem an enjoyable person. I commend you, at least, for this. |
