SEXI: Mostly Fact, A Little Fiction, Not Vicious Attacks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : SEXI: Mostly Fact, A Little Fiction, Not Vicious Attacks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael d kugler who wrote (6719)	11/9/1996 6:26:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	of 13351

mike, the press release accused huttoe of issuing 39 million shares to himself, his family and corporations under his control. they gave the number of 39 million shares. they accused him of selling 4-5 million shares for a $10 mm profit. now, if huttoe illegally issued 39 mm shares and sold 4-5 mm, where do you suppose those other shares are. perhaps the numbers are preliminary. perhaps not. that is why i used the term inference. let's take this one step further. huttoe illegally posses 34 mm shares (not including those he's sold). do you suppose that the sec is going to sue him to return his profits to the shareholders and say, "oh, by the way, have a great time with the 34 mm illegal shares we will let you keep..."? now maybe this will happen. even so, it will have TO DEFY ALL LOGIC AND REASONING. i have to assume the sec has done some due dilly and found 39 issued and 4-5 mm sold, otherwise they wouldn't have issued the release. the clear inference is that the sec WILL NOT LET HUTTOE KEEP ILLEGAL SHARES... good luck...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next