Mr. Chapman, I see you appear to be a fan of William O'Neill. Did you read his book? What other TA methods are you familiar with?
BTW, you may have missed my post. Please help me understand. Am I correct in assuming you are leery of a
free independent professional evaluation of a product that I cannot see and that was
tested by a company that I cannot find, and that although you may obtain access to that
original testing company, you refuse to corroborate the rumored testing company's
existence with even a phone number?
The only evaluation of the alleged product is a third party report by someone who was
paid to write it.
A non-biased independent evaluation would silence the "bashers" as you call them, but
you refuse to allow that the person that has offered to do the evaluation has a sense of
humor, and covertly imply that this person may have a hidden and complex motive for
testing this alleged product for free, and further, that this professional would make a
false and biased report of the findings of his test.
At the same time, you have no problem with fully believing the information already
disseminated on the alleged product from the company that says they own it, information
from the parent company that comes via a paid conduit onto the Internet, with other
rumors and data via third parties via the Internet, and choose to accept this data as
factual in lieu of independent data.
Is this in fact your position? Thank you so much. MMC |
