SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Data Dimensions

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: golfaholic who wrote (4381)5/7/1998 5:23:00 PM
From: oexwa  Read Replies (2) of 4571
 
Golfaholic, I am short and I am nervous. I tend to view the Y2K (only) companies on the following basis:

It is like a company acquires the rights to market the 1999 Titanic calendar. It is an assured best seller. Say that they paid $200,000 for those non-exclusive rights. One would assume that they would want to make profits during the next year that would exceed the $200K that they paid for their rights. Sales would start right away and ramp up so that by December 1998, they should have profits of over $200K. By that time, they should have recouped their entire investment and made a profit. That would give them a P/E of 1 or less. After that date, they anything they made would be a bonus.

What I don't understand is that DDIM is making only pennies per quarter when they need to make dollars per quarter to justify a price of $16. Consensus estimates for the balance of this year and next only add to about $2. Assume they double the estimates. This is still only $4 per share. What are they going to do to justify the other $12 per share?

After January 1, 2000, most of the problem will be fixed. Yes, there will be some cleanup that might last another year, but there will be a bazillion COBOL programmers and companies fighting for a smaller and smaller pie. It is hard to see how any company would be profitable in that environment The days of these companies commanding P/E's of 320 when a P/E of 3 is too high has to be numbered, doesn't it?

Inquiring minds want to know why my analysis does not agree with the market.

Thanks, Bob
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext